Authorized testing only. We assess a website or app you own or have explicit written permission to test, and report what we find in plain language with a clear severity and fix for each issue — including the kind of gaps that show up often in AI-generated and vibe-coded sites.
VAPT (Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing) is a combined security review of a website or application: a vulnerability assessment scans for known weaknesses across the system, and a penetration test actively attempts to exploit them the way a real attacker would, within an agreed scope and with written authorization. The two together give a more complete picture than either alone — the assessment finds breadth, the test confirms which findings are actually exploitable. This is the term Indian enterprises, government tenders, and compliance frameworks use for what this page describes.
There's no single number — VAPT pricing scales with scope, not a flat rate. The main factors: how many pages, endpoints, or API routes are in scope; whether it's black-box (no internal access, closer to a real attacker's view), grey-box, or white-box testing (source-code access, faster and more thorough); and whether the engagement needs to satisfy a specific compliance framework (SOC 2, ISO 27001, a government tender's security clause) versus a general assessment. We scope and quote after an initial conversation about what you're actually testing and why, rather than publishing a number that wouldn't be accurate for most engagements anyway.
A growing number of sites and apps are built quickly with AI coding tools, with little or no security review along the way. Common issues — exposed API keys, missing input validation, weak authentication, misconfigured access controls — often aren't caught until something goes wrong. We only test systems you own or have explicit written authorization to test.
We run an authorized assessment of a website or application's attack surface: authentication and session handling, input validation, exposed configuration or credentials, access control, and common web vulnerability classes (such as those in the OWASP Top 10). For AI-generated or vibe-coded sites specifically, we also check for the patterns that tool tends to produce — hardcoded secrets, missing server-side checks behind a client-side-only UI, and default configurations left unchanged.
A written report of findings with severity ratings and recommended fixes. This is a point-in-time assessment within an agreed scope, not a guarantee against future vulnerabilities or a compliance certification.
Founders and businesses who own a website or app, including ones built with AI tools, and want an authorized, honest assessment of where it's exposed before someone finds it the hard way.
There's no flat rate — VAPT pricing scales with the number of pages/endpoints in scope, whether it's black-box, grey-box, or white-box testing, and whether it needs to satisfy a specific compliance framework. We scope and quote after an initial conversation rather than publishing a number that wouldn't be accurate for most engagements.
Yes, when testing is authorized. We require written confirmation that you own the system or have explicit permission from the owner to test it, and we stay within the agreed scope.
Yes — this is one of the specific use cases we handle, since quickly AI-generated code often has predictable gaps (hardcoded secrets, client-side-only validation, default configs left unchanged).
A written report: each finding, its severity, and a recommended fix. We can also walk your team through it on a call.
No. A penetration test finds what's identifiable within the agreed scope and timeframe — it reduces risk, it doesn't eliminate it or replace ongoing security practice.